Objects In Space is a new indie open-world space game. Its developer announced today that this game will be releasing in Early Access on June 21, 2018.
I think fans of LT might want to have a look at this one. It uses retro graphics, but from a quick watch of the Alpha gameplay video (linked below), I was surprised by the number of features described that sound much like things Josh has mentioned, or that fans of LT have suggested here.
Post
Fri May 11, 2018 7:57 am
#2
Re: Objects In Space
This looks great. Oddly, it reminds me of SSN-21 Seawolf with the navigation screen in particular and the systems management to some degree. All it needs is a sick MIDI soundtrack to go along with it
Post
Sat May 12, 2018 3:00 am
#4
Re: Objects In Space
I'm very excited about this, the claustrophobic sensor-watching sounds right up my alley!
panic
Post
Sat May 12, 2018 12:14 pm
#6
Re: Objects In Space
I also was struck by how much the sensor system shown for this game matches how I imagine (and have suggested) LT's scanner might work.
There's a real and important difference between these games, though, which might matter with respect to sensor use: Objects In Space is actually described by its creator as being somewhat inspired by submarine warfare, while Limit Theory is more about Freelancer-style dogfighting.
So the careful study of sensor data probably is a better fit for Objects In Space than for a game that wants to emphasize exciting seat-of-your-pants dogfighting. I can understand why gamers who are here for the dogfighting see us talking about super-detailed scanner functionality and wonder what we're smoking.
OTOH, Josh obviously also cares about the "exploration game" in LT. This is stuff where no one's actively shooting at you, and you're trying to perceive patterns in the world of the game. In this mode, having a scanner with lots of useful options to frob makes sense for supporting fun gameplay.
It'll be interesting to see how Objects In Space handles this as a part of the full game.
There's a real and important difference between these games, though, which might matter with respect to sensor use: Objects In Space is actually described by its creator as being somewhat inspired by submarine warfare, while Limit Theory is more about Freelancer-style dogfighting.
So the careful study of sensor data probably is a better fit for Objects In Space than for a game that wants to emphasize exciting seat-of-your-pants dogfighting. I can understand why gamers who are here for the dogfighting see us talking about super-detailed scanner functionality and wonder what we're smoking.
OTOH, Josh obviously also cares about the "exploration game" in LT. This is stuff where no one's actively shooting at you, and you're trying to perceive patterns in the world of the game. In this mode, having a scanner with lots of useful options to frob makes sense for supporting fun gameplay.
It'll be interesting to see how Objects In Space handles this as a part of the full game.
Post
Sun May 13, 2018 10:33 pm
#7
Re: Objects In Space
Aye, that does seem quite similar to LT's sensor function, and I like the idea that your detectability range is dependent on how noisy/bright your ship is as well as the "objects go grey and their positions vague if you aren't looking at them"
As for detailed sensor data being incongruous to the freelancer dogfighting style of play, LT isn't freelancer and dogfighting is merely one of the several focuses of the game. A fighter may only need to know the position, velocity, and health of an enemy, but a miner probably wants to scan a rock to see what it contains without drilling into it, and a trader might want to know the capacity of your cargo hold. The information is all already there, if the player doesn't need it for that part of the game, hide it but make it accessible if the player wants to see it.
As for detailed sensor data being incongruous to the freelancer dogfighting style of play, LT isn't freelancer and dogfighting is merely one of the several focuses of the game. A fighter may only need to know the position, velocity, and health of an enemy, but a miner probably wants to scan a rock to see what it contains without drilling into it, and a trader might want to know the capacity of your cargo hold. The information is all already there, if the player doesn't need it for that part of the game, hide it but make it accessible if the player wants to see it.
Challenging your assumptions is good for your health, good for your business, and good for your future. Stay skeptical but never undervalue the importance of a new and unfamiliar perspective.
Imagination Fertilizer
Beauty may not save the world, but it's the only thing that can
Imagination Fertilizer
Beauty may not save the world, but it's the only thing that can
Post
Sun May 13, 2018 10:50 pm
#8
Actually, no, the game looks pretty cool. Wish you could see some of the universe around you, though. Doesn't look like you can, unless I missed it.
Re: Objects In Space
Yeah, what are you guys smoking?Flatfingers wrote: ↑Sat May 12, 2018 12:14 pmSo the careful study of sensor data probably is a better fit for Objects In Space than for a game that wants to emphasize exciting seat-of-your-pants dogfighting. I can understand why gamers who are here for the dogfighting see us talking about super-detailed scanner functionality and wonder what we're smoking.
Actually, no, the game looks pretty cool. Wish you could see some of the universe around you, though. Doesn't look like you can, unless I missed it.
Have a question? Send me a PM! || I have a Patreon page up for REKT now! || People talking in IRC over the past two hours:
Post
Sun May 13, 2018 11:44 pm
#9
Maybe the developer, instead of allocating time to rendering pretty views of space, spent that time creating NPC avatars that walk around? I can definitely see that chewing up an enormous amount of attention.
Plus, it makes sense that "space ships as submarines" de-emphasizes visuals in favor of tactical data.
Just thinking out loud.
Re: Objects In Space
Maybe the developer, instead of allocating time to rendering pretty views of space, spent that time creating NPC avatars that walk around? I can definitely see that chewing up an enormous amount of attention.
Plus, it makes sense that "space ships as submarines" de-emphasizes visuals in favor of tactical data.
Just thinking out loud.
Post
Wed Jul 04, 2018 1:06 pm
#10
Objects in Spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace
Anyone seen this badboy?
Early access, blah blah, but looks like it could be fun. Like Silent Service crossed with Elite crossed with... I dunno', something.
I'll probably give it a bit o' time to settle, then I'll pick it up.
Early access, blah blah, but looks like it could be fun. Like Silent Service crossed with Elite crossed with... I dunno', something.
I'll probably give it a bit o' time to settle, then I'll pick it up.
Post
Thu Jul 05, 2018 2:39 am
#12
Re: Objects in Spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace
Egads, my search skillz failed me me!
Guess we need a merge here.....
Guess we need a merge here.....
Post
Thu Jul 05, 2018 8:30 pm
#13
Re: Objects in Spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace
I'm glad you're watching this one -- it really does look intriguing.
Post
Thu Jul 05, 2018 8:37 pm
#14
Re: Objects in Spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace
Thread merge! (Thanks Flat!)
Have a question? Send me a PM! || I have a Patreon page up for REKT now! || People talking in IRC over the past two hours:
Post
Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:39 am
#15
Re: Objects In Space
It released! Someone gifted it to me, so I'm able to give it a go. First impressions are both wonderful and terrible.
The wonderful: the game itself feels amazing and immersive. I found the tutorial pretty decent - although they favored immersion over clarity, which I think was a bad decision, it paid off in the end... after a lot of poking around trying to figure out which button it wanted me to push. It wasn't until I found the ingame help that I really got anywhere. The star cluster is quite expansive and it's clear you can do some awesome things with ships later on.
The terrible: It's buggy, crashes occasionally, and you can't choose when you save (or make multiple saves). Again, probably done for immersion. In this case it's a fatal flaw because the game isn't stable. In my current save there appears to be a bug that makes it impossible for me to make any money from completing contracts. This is a Very Bad Thing, because that's how you make money in the game. I hesitate to use the term "unplayable", but I can't progress anywhere in the game with this bug acting the way it is. Quitting and restarting doesn't seem to make a difference; it seems to be tied to the save somehow. (Or possibly my computer.) Near the start, you earn almost as much money from each contract as it takes to pay docking fees, meaning you make slightly more than it takes to break even. With contracts broken, this saps your funds very, very quickly, and eventually you reach a point where you're not allowed to leave a station at all, and the game "ends". (Unofficially. You simply don't have the funds to take back off.)
It doesn't feel like a full release to me, but rather an alpha with great promise. I want to like it, but the bugs make it difficult.
The wonderful: the game itself feels amazing and immersive. I found the tutorial pretty decent - although they favored immersion over clarity, which I think was a bad decision, it paid off in the end... after a lot of poking around trying to figure out which button it wanted me to push. It wasn't until I found the ingame help that I really got anywhere. The star cluster is quite expansive and it's clear you can do some awesome things with ships later on.
The terrible: It's buggy, crashes occasionally, and you can't choose when you save (or make multiple saves). Again, probably done for immersion. In this case it's a fatal flaw because the game isn't stable. In my current save there appears to be a bug that makes it impossible for me to make any money from completing contracts. This is a Very Bad Thing, because that's how you make money in the game. I hesitate to use the term "unplayable", but I can't progress anywhere in the game with this bug acting the way it is. Quitting and restarting doesn't seem to make a difference; it seems to be tied to the save somehow. (Or possibly my computer.) Near the start, you earn almost as much money from each contract as it takes to pay docking fees, meaning you make slightly more than it takes to break even. With contracts broken, this saps your funds very, very quickly, and eventually you reach a point where you're not allowed to leave a station at all, and the game "ends". (Unofficially. You simply don't have the funds to take back off.)
It doesn't feel like a full release to me, but rather an alpha with great promise. I want to like it, but the bugs make it difficult.
Have a question? Send me a PM! || I have a Patreon page up for REKT now! || People talking in IRC over the past two hours: