They are sitting here discussing a (subjectivly) crap game concept, on a forum about a much better game concept, while neither concept it really even close to the level they need to be to be a game.
No, they really don't. :V
They are sitting here discussing a (subjectivly) crap game concept, on a forum about a much better game concept, while neither concept it really even close to the level they need to be to be a game.
I'm a recluse... not friendless, ResultsMayDiffer.ResultsMayDiffer wrote: ↑Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:14 pm
Then some loner like Victor Tombs piped up 'but I don't have friends?'
In contrast to Limit Theory, Star Citizen has playable Segments out, that can be evaluated and criticized...
They are sitting here discussing a (subjectivly) crap game concept, on a forum about a much better game concept, while neither concept it really even close to the level they need to be to be a game.
No, they really don't. :V
Copy that, Victor.Victor Tombs wrote: ↑Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:46 pmI'm a recluse... not friendless, ResultsMayDiffer.ResultsMayDiffer wrote: ↑Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:14 pm
Then some loner like Victor Tombs piped up 'but I don't have friends?'
Yes and No. But you are right I am now giving up trying to change anyone's mind. If backers had put as much effort towards keeping CIG and Chris accountable as they do towards mocking critics the game would have been out years ago. At this stage it doesn't matter. There is no game. There never will be a game. There will only be a continuation of CIG's failures, incompetence, and pathetic mismanagement until the money runs out.
It's not about the feeling. I'm willing to listen to criticism about Star Citizen. The other critics, I don't know of and have no problem with. It's only Derek Smart in particular. He's "infamous" online for being a caustic jerk to everyone around him - and intentionally so. He derives pleasure from it and has stated as such. It's hard to take that kind of person seriously, because you know every word out of their mouth is going to be negative regardless of what they're talking about. They cease to be a reliable source of information, and you can't hold meaningful conversations with them.ResultsMayDiffer wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2017 9:27 amDoes something make them feel nervous or anxious or attacked? Then it goes in the BAD category and cannot be allowed to be real, ever. Just like the facebook video I linked. I think Tal won't watch it and I bet most closed it immediately if they even bother clicking it after Tal said it contained whoever. They don't care about the content but only the feeling.
Whether you believe it is your intent to hurt people with this or not, "manchildren" is not only rude, it's universally perceived as an insult. This does not make for civil discourse.ResultsMayDiffer wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2017 9:27 amI call Citizens "manchildren", this is how they behave like children. The content doesn't matter, only the way it makes them feel. Intent does not matter, if it hurts them to hear your words you must have meant to hurt them.
Probably a wise move. You wouldn't stand a snowball's chance as I'm sitting on 6-7 years of footage evidencing CIG's inability to deliver. All you have is hopes and dreams.Victor Tombs wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2017 10:09 amI was considering replying to the text of your post, ResultsMayDiffer, but you continue to insult people so I've decided not to bother.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests