Yeah, the last one was really funny. ^^Talvieno wrote:Fake and old, but funny, yes.

Didn't know it was that old...

Yeah, the last one was really funny. ^^Talvieno wrote:Fake and old, but funny, yes.

Didn't know it was that old...

Automation engineer, lateral thinker, soldier, addicted to music, books and gaming.

Nothing to see here

Nothing to see here

Flatfingers wrote: 23.01.2017: "Show me the smoldering corpse of Perfectionist Josh"

They taught us Python because they had long beards and didn't believe in paying for software

That...seems a little out of context...Scytale wrote:They taught us Python because they had long beards and didn't believe in paying for software

Automation engineer, lateral thinker, soldier, addicted to music, books and gaming.

Nothing to see here

Nothing to see here

Flatfingers wrote: 23.01.2017: "Show me the smoldering corpse of Perfectionist Josh"

Haha sorry, I meant as an alternative to teaching MATLAB with its high licensing fees, and that, from a student's perspective they're very similar syntactically for numerical purposes. It's also about as easy to teach as MATLAB, for those purposes, and you get it for zero cost.JanB1 wrote:That...seems a little out of context...Scytale wrote:They taught us Python because they had long beards and didn't believe in paying for software

The long beards just means they liked Linux and open source as a matter of course.

No, and neither was GNU Octave. Besides, if you're going to go with an alternative to MATLAB, Python seems the more versatile for pedagogical purposes, not to mention applicable to a wider range of problems.Cornflakes_91 wrote:And scilab, which is matlab compatible, wasnt good enough?

If I were teaching a course in physical engineering that needed a quick language to teach in and I didn't care for the licencing cost of MATLAB, Python would make a lot of sense to me.

e: and since Python is so well-documented, it means that if students are having problems there are plenty of resources online for them. Along with most matlab capability added through numpy, scipy, and matplotlib, it's just a logical choice.

Hmm...thank you for this really interesting and well thought through look at this whole situation.Scytale wrote:No, and neither was GNU Octave. Besides, if you're going to go with an alternative to MATLAB, Python seems the more versatile for pedagogical purposes, not to mention applicable to a wider range of problems.Cornflakes_91 wrote:And scilab, which is matlab compatible, wasnt good enough?

If I were teaching a course in physical engineering that needed a quick language to teach in and I didn't care for the licencing cost of MATLAB, Python would make a lot of sense to me.

e: and since Python is so well-documented, it means that if students are having problems there are plenty of resources online for them. Along with most matlab capability added through numpy, scipy, and matplotlib, it's just a logical choice.

Automation engineer, lateral thinker, soldier, addicted to music, books and gaming.

Nothing to see here

Nothing to see here

Flatfingers wrote: 23.01.2017: "Show me the smoldering corpse of Perfectionist Josh"

No worries, and that's kind of you! But uh, I'm still not a programmer, and I daresay there will be computer scientists more qualified than I to comment on this. My perspective is just as an engineer and for how the useful the language may be for teaching.JanB1 wrote:Hmm...thank you for this really interesting and well thought through look at this whole situation.Scytale wrote:No, and neither was GNU Octave. Besides, if you're going to go with an alternative to MATLAB, Python seems the more versatile for pedagogical purposes, not to mention applicable to a wider range of problems.Cornflakes_91 wrote:And scilab, which is matlab compatible, wasnt good enough?

If I were teaching a course in physical engineering that needed a quick language to teach in and I didn't care for the licencing cost of MATLAB, Python would make a lot of sense to me.

e: and since Python is so well-documented, it means that if students are having problems there are plenty of resources online for them. Along with most matlab capability added through numpy, scipy, and matplotlib, it's just a logical choice.

I don't doubt that if you really wanted a proper MATLAB alternative to do exactly what MATLAB does, or as close to it as possible, then Scilab and Octave would be great because they're built for that purpose. I just think Python is much more accessible on all these fronts for a student's perspective.

I also personally suspect it's easier to move from Python to other, lower-level languages for numerical purposes than it is for MATLAB, but again, IANACS.

I like python as well, though I am not very experienced with it. I have been using structs in C for ages, but the topic has never been broached for MATLAB in my courses. Python seems more adaptive to me, considering all the libraries that are easily accessible and we'll documented, but I haven't played much with MATLAB on my own time either so maybe similar libraries for MATLAB exist and I just am not aware of them. I just don't see writing a serial communication program in MATLAB, you know?

Libertas per Technica

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest