## Communications Gameplay in Limit Theory

Post

### Re: Communications Gameplay in Limit Theory

#76
Hmm...if you analyse the language to get the word usage frequencies and apply binary node tree, that could work. You could, for example, use 2 bits to store the word "the", because it's used so often. Yeah, that might work. But you would still need at least 2 bits for often used words and more bits for less frequently used word. So, in the end it's still a little unrealistic that you have an average of 1-2 bits per word...
Automation engineer, lateral thinker, soldier, addicted to music, books and gaming.
Nothing to see here
Flatfingers wrote: 23.01.2017: "Show me the smoldering corpse of Perfectionist Josh"
Post

### Re: Communications Gameplay in Limit Theory

#77
JanB1 wrote:
Sun Jun 18, 2017 1:07 am
So, in the end it's still a little unrealistic that you have an average of 1-2 bits per word...
Thats why
Silverware wrote:it's 1.0-1.2 bits per letter.
Post

### Re: Communications Gameplay in Limit Theory

#78
Cornflakes_91 wrote:
Sun Jun 18, 2017 1:18 am
JanB1 wrote:
Sun Jun 18, 2017 1:07 am
So, in the end it's still a little unrealistic that you have an average of 1-2 bits per word...
Thats why
Silverware wrote:it's 1.0-1.2 bits per letter.
Yeah it was 1-2 bits per word I wrote originally, but that was from misremembering it.
Just change bits to bytes there and you get the same effect, and the same speed transmissions are still easy enough to send text over.

Also, letters like e would have a higher entropy = more bits, because they are used so frequently.
Q however, would make the next letter almost always a U and reduce entropy.
°˖◝(ಠ‸ಠ)◜˖°
Toba - A Development Dump
Post

### Re: Communications Gameplay in Limit Theory

#79
Except that things that appear often (like "e") have less informational content = bits because they dont convey much data.
If exactly every third letter were an e the information it contains would be 0, because its position is predictable.

rarer letters like q and z would contain more information because they're rare and thus "surprising", telling you something you couldnt have predicted.

Q would increase the effective entropy of any u directly following it, though.
Last edited by Cornflakes_91 on Sun Jun 18, 2017 9:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post

### Re: Communications Gameplay in Limit Theory

#82
Silverware wrote:
Sun Jun 18, 2017 1:03 pm
Cornflakes_91 wrote:
Sun Jun 18, 2017 1:18 am
JanB1 wrote:
Sun Jun 18, 2017 1:07 am
So, in the end it's still a little unrealistic that you have an average of 1-2 bits per word...
Thats why
Silverware wrote:it's 1.0-1.2 bits per letter.
Yeah it was 1-2 bits per word I wrote originally, but that was from misremembering it.
Just change bits to bytes there and you get the same effect, and the same speed transmissions are still easy enough to send text over.

Also, letters like e would have a higher entropy = more bits, because they are used so frequently.
Q however, would make the next letter almost always a U and reduce entropy.
Aaah. Sorry Corn, got confused by Silver because, as he said, he wrote "word" before, not letter.
Automation engineer, lateral thinker, soldier, addicted to music, books and gaming.
Nothing to see here
Flatfingers wrote: 23.01.2017: "Show me the smoldering corpse of Perfectionist Josh"

### Online Now

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests