BFett wrote:I voted no because I don't want Josh doing extra work if he doesn't have the time to do it. I am however for a backer giving their pledge to another person if they absolutely don't want it. This does give Josh more work for changing target email addresses or whatever goes on in the back end but at least it doesn't allow Josh to lose any funding he already has.

I dont want Josh doing extra either, I just want him to let us pay for him to buy better gear, inspiring toys, trips to see Star Wars, his copy of Fo4. etc. :V

Silverware wrote:....... his copy of Fo4. etc. :V

Do you want LT to be delayed until 2017?

Also voted no, rather have Josh focus on limit theory dev instead of store dev.

(BUT! if you decide to do this, I'd LOVE to upgrade my pledge to beta level )

I didn't find out about LT in time to make a pledge and get any rewards, and would love a chance to get earlier access to the game. But I still agree with the above opinions, it's better he just gets on with the game than worries about this kinda aggro, as such, I am voting no!

But if it does happen, I'll be happy to buy someone's pledge off them

ps, accounts been active a while, but this is my first post, hi everyone!

AbhChallenger wrote:

Silverware wrote:....... his copy of Fo4. etc. :V

Do you want LT to be delayed until 2017?

Or later.

Gonna go ahead and close it now guys, we all know the answer Especially considering responses to the latest KS update, I think #2, as a majority of you have advised, is the right way to go. Thanks so much to all who weighed in, I appreciate it a lot!