"past 5 minutes"BFett wrote: How is my name not on that list?
If you do, we'll just apply some extra volts and you'll be up and running (well, maybe slowly stumbling and screaming AAArrrgh) in no time.Frankestein wrote:So .... this means i won't die a lurker ?
Glad to hear he is okay and may get back in touch with the forum.Talvieno wrote:I had a long chat with him, and he should be making a post on here (not this specific thread, hopefully; I've strongly advised against that) very soon. Basically: he's still hard at work.
No problem at all Victor. I was very surprised as well, and relieved with seeing Josh logged.Victor Tombs wrote:My apologies, I wasn't ignoring you Dromeda5. It was a bit of a shock to this elder's system at a very early hour in the morning. It wasn't a dream after all and both Silver and Nathan have confirmed it.
Public domain is public domain. The fact your entire premise relies entirely on obfuscating that fact reveals your entire argument as technically weak.mcsven wrote:Fortunately no interpretation is required; your original words are admirably clear.kaeroku wrote:I fully advocate public domain information being shared among members of that domain, yes. Any other interpretation is creative bullshit.mcsven wrote:<snip>
I'd like to make a few points about this "information in the public domain" argument.
Firstly, the word "information" here is doing a lot of work, because it is obscuring what we're actually talking about: details of Josh's private life. If you're going to make this case then at least have the courage of your convictions and be clear: you advocate details of Josh's private life being shared.
Secondly, the public nature of this information doesn't immediately lend it moral weight. We're all here because of Limit Theory, not Josh's private life. We're not his friends, in the usual understanding of the word. Josh has been remarkably forthcoming about the personal issues that have affected his ability to do what he promised in the Kickstarter, and I have exchanged posts on this forum and a few chats in IRC with him... but my connection to Josh is through the development of the game, not aspects of his personal life. Nothing he has ever said or done gives me the moral authority go to hunting around on Facebook to determine what's going on in his life in my view. I would regard that as being true even if I were bringing a lawsuit to get my pledge back.
He's here again, Dromeda5.Dromeda5 wrote:No problem at all Victor. I was very surprised as well, and relieved with seeing Josh logged.
I'm doing my best not to spook him. 
LT Backer Number: 647 of 5449.I'll admit I've refreshed a few times, Tycow.Tycow wrote:So I'm not the only one pounding F5?
I strongly second that, with one minor change: anything related to game content of any sort will do for me, even if a paragraph on what's new in the game.Victor Tombs wrote:In those days the coding warrior was like clockwork with his posts...well almost.
I hope he will reappear again and post something...anything will do for me. Even one of those tasteless limericks that DW is so fond of. *chuckle*
It would be really nice to get that in here. But we do see that Josh is alive again, so hopefully he gets himself in a position to start producing game related content for us again.Dromeda5 wrote:I strongly second that, with one minor change: anything related to game content of any sort will do for me, even if a paragraph on what's new in the game.Victor Tombs wrote:In those days the coding warrior was like clockwork with his posts...well almost.
I hope he will reappear again and post something...anything will do for me. Even one of those tasteless limericks that DW is so fond of. *chuckle*
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests
