Dinosawer wrote:

BFett wrote:Wait, did I miss something?

Yes.
The joke.

Yes, I'm honored to even be mentioned, haha.

Victor Tombs wrote:I just smile sweetly knowing full well I'm right, like the smug so and so I am.

As someone once put it:

"I could agree with you but then we'd both be wrong"

Memnoch wrote:As someone once put it:

"I could agree with you but then we'd both be wrong"

So you don't believe I'm a smug so and so, Memnoch? That's rather nice of you. *chuckle*

mcsven wrote:<snip>

I fully advocate public domain information being shared among members of that domain, yes. Any other interpretation is creative bullshit.

Victor Tombs wrote:

Memnoch wrote:As someone once put it:

"I could agree with you but then we'd both be wrong"

So you don't believe I'm a smug so and so, Memnoch? That's rather nice of you. *chuckle*

You are more than welcome.

kaeroku wrote:

mcsven wrote:<snip>

I fully advocate public domain information being shared among members of that domain, yes. Any other interpretation is creative bullshit.

Fortunately no interpretation is required; your original words are admirably clear.

I'd like to make a few points about this "information in the public domain" argument.

Firstly, the word "information" here is doing a lot of work, because it is obscuring what we're actually talking about: details of Josh's private life. If you're going to make this case then at least have the courage of your convictions and be clear: you advocate details of Josh's private life being shared.

Secondly, the public nature of this information doesn't immediately lend it moral weight. We're all here because of Limit Theory, not Josh's private life. We're not his friends, in the usual understanding of the word. Josh has been remarkably forthcoming about the personal issues that have affected his ability to do what he promised in the Kickstarter, and I have exchanged posts on this forum and a few chats in IRC with him... but my connection to Josh is through the development of the game, not aspects of his personal life. Nothing he has ever said or done gives me the moral authority go to hunting around on Facebook to determine what's going on in his life in my view. I would regard that as being true even if I were bringing a lawsuit to get my pledge back.

Well, that proves Josh is still in the land of the living. I could be dreaming this but that looks like the red coat of Josh Parnell. Welcome back Josh I hope you are well.

Any news for us or is such interest expressed here doomed to be ignored?

Hmm... this could very well be a dream. I'll check back in the morning to confirm. Strange how seeing that red coat got me excited again. I thought I'd gone beyond such feelings.

Victor, do you have time for a PM?

Of course, I do, Nathan.

Victor Tombs wrote:Well, that proves Josh is still in the land of the living. I could be dreaming this but that looks like the red coat of Josh Parnell. Welcome back Josh I hope you are well.

Any news for us or is such interest expressed here doomed to be ignored?

Are you talking about the fact that Josh finally logged in the forums today after near 5 months (which yes, at least confirms he is among the living), or am I missing something else?

It was great to chat with you again, Josh.

Victor Tombs wrote:It was great to chat with you again, Josh.

This is very true, Josh needs to show up in those places more often.

Victor Tombs wrote:It was great to chat with you again, Josh.

Que?

Was this in IRC or something? Anything worth relaying to the rest of us?

I had a long chat with him, and he should be making a post on here (not this specific thread, hopefully; I've strongly advised against that) very soon. Basically: he's still hard at work.