Re: Mass Effect: Andromeda
Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:50 am
This article...Dinosawer wrote:Well.
Given what I enjoyed most about ME they apparently screwed up...
*crosses off to-buy list*
This article...Dinosawer wrote:Well.
Given what I enjoyed most about ME they apparently screwed up...
*crosses off to-buy list*
... Okay that just made me want to buy it again after seeing IGN's really bad review of it. :VFlatfingers wrote:This is probably not a commentary of any kind:
Flatfingers wrote:This is probably not a commentary of any kind:
Flatfingers wrote:This is probably not a commentary of any kind:
In fairness, EA can still bust out some very good games. I just wish this had been one of them.Silverware wrote:Or both?
It is EA involved. And their incompetence is legendary.
Still, at least it's not Ubisoft, they only have one quality level anymore. "Bad"
The first bit is why I say not Ubi.Scytale wrote:In fairness, EA can still bust out some very good games. I just wish this had been one of them.
e: like you say though it's not Ubisoft
I see it the same way: my metric is that a game has "paid for itself", in a sense, if I can get $1 an hour value out of it.Silverware wrote:The first bit is why I say not Ubi.Scytale wrote:In fairness, EA can still bust out some very good games. I just wish this had been one of them.
e: like you say though it's not Ubisoft
I am sure I will enjoy the game enough and for long enough to break even in my mind.
Remember, compare it to a Movie at a cinema (or on DVD)
1 play through = 1 watch of the movie.
so $12 for a movie ticket for maybe 2 hours.
So a game that entertains for 20 hours is worth at least $120 in that case.
Yes this means I would actually pay a LOT more for some games :3
https://steamdb.info/calculator/7656119 ... 245/?cc=nzScytale wrote:I see it the same way: my metric is that a game has "paid for itself", in a sense, if I can get $1 an hour value out of it.
By this metric Skyrim is one of the cheaper games I've bought, though I got it for full price on release
I usually want my games to get $0.25 an hour or so. By this logic, the best bang-for-buck I had was definitely I-War 2. I estimate at least four thousand hours in it, for ten bucks.Scytale wrote: I see it the same way: my metric is that a game has "paid for itself", in a sense, if I can get $1 an hour value out of it.
Damn son, you beat me... https://steamdb.info/calculator/7656119 ... 861/?cc=usSilverware wrote: https://steamdb.info/calculator/7656119 ... 245/?cc=nz
Hmm...this game looks interesting. Reminds me of another game...IronDuke wrote:(...) best bang-for-buck I had was definitely I-War 2. (...)