Saying "They're going to be negative no matter what so F*** them" is not a valid point. They're still backers and if we're going to just ignore them, we might as well ignore their money too. They have a right to be upset, entitlement or not.Katorone wrote:The naysayers will naysay whatever the message is, positive or negative. People genuinly concerned/involved with LT will get Josh's message.
Sure some might not like it, and could use some extra clarification. I would welcome a Q&A session with Josh, but not only to hear about the shift in deadline. I'm eager to hear more of what he envisions for the future.
And when I said Q&A, I meant more of an elaboration on what's going on so people are informed. Not something like an AMA surrounding just the delay. Something concise, and to the point but still informative.