of course,Dinosawer wrote:"Concept", "2027", my doubt is high
but if, it would be cool ^^
(not sure about wifi connected eyes though xD)
of course,Dinosawer wrote:"Concept", "2027", my doubt is high
I'm waiting for the manufacturers to chrome all of their artillery shells and rocketsBFett wrote:Military laser. The video half way down is worth watching.
I don't think that's going to workOddy wrote:I'm waiting for the manufacturers to chrome all of their artillery shells and rocketsBFett wrote:Military laser. The video half way down is worth watching.
^ this guy didnt read the articleOddy wrote:I'm waiting for the manufacturers to chrome all of their artillery shells and rocketsBFett wrote:Military laser. The video half way down is worth watching.
also: a nice quote from projectrho that just makes it simple to understand why reflective armor is useless.The Unread Article wrote: MBDA's tests have also helped to debunk the science-fiction idea that reflective armour would defend against laser weapons. They found that any dust on the mirrored surface would get burned in, and lead to the destruction of the target even faster than with a non-reflective surface.
Projectrho wrote: Now I know all you older science fiction fans still remember Johnny Quest and The Mystery Of The Lizard Men where Dr. Quest demonstrates that one can defend oneself against a weapon-grade laser beam with a dressing-room mirror. Sorry, it doesn't work that way in reality. No mirror is 100% efficient, and at these power levels, the fraction that leaks through is more than enough to vaporize the mirror armor. The same goes for "ablative armor." One zap and the impact point is abruptly as bare of armor as a baby's behind.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests